jam took no damage and lost nada.
The point I was trying to make is that I do lose something. hitting the spike and collecting ores is exactly the same as hitting a bot and collecting direct EXP. I trade the ore for money which in turns go to buy parchment which I trade for dust which I trade for exp. It's a different process with the exact same result.
An attack is a thing which affects harmfully. By shoving me off the spike while I'm trying to level there, you're in effect preventing me from leveling. Given that it's impossible, in any reasonable amount of time, to level at the spike without going afk, it could be argued that shoving players off the spike is similar to zone hoarding. You're preventing those players from leveling. I'm not trying to push that argument, just showing its similarities.
Not asking for special treatment and privilages, just to be treated fairly rather then have you attacking and overmugging me at every opportunity.
Here you are again accusing me of breaking rules. I'll give up admin if it can ever be shown that I've ever over-mugged you. It's never happened. And never have I done it at 'every opportunity.' I can count on my fingers (I have 8 fingers and 2 thumbs) the number of times I've mugged you.
This is the main issue I have with you: you make many baseless accusations against me. You talk of treating others with respect; where's the respect in making stuff like this up? Don't be a hypocrite.
I'm not asking you to stop shoving me from the spike or Uber (I ask players to shove me or fell me out of uber if I'm afk and over 101). I'm asking you to stop making stuff up.
I downloaded all of the duess stuff here and have not seen anything that auto takes ss.
It's on Taurik's site...www.linneberg.com
I have only ever treated you with dignity and respect and tried to be freands. It appears I am the only one with this desire to get along.
I never had spoken to you or formed any opinion of you before you shoved me from the spike. After you did, I did what I'd do to all who've done similar to me: either mug a few items or kill a couple of times. As you're obviously out of my range, I opted for the former and mugged you a couple of times (once in Elven, once in Jaten), and always within legal limits. At the time, you stated that the reason you shoved me off in the first place was because I had been ceaselessly following you to various zones mugging you. Now, in this forum, you've admitted that it actually began at the point you shoved me off the spike. Mysteriously, the part where I mug you of all your items in every zone is pushed further up the time line until after you shoved me off.
I'd love to make peace, just stop making stuff up about me. You don't even have to admit you made it up, I'm sure you believe it all happened exactly as you've said. Just stop making up more or start providing some evidence of any of this stuff happening.
Just for a little clarification:
The second post referrs to no one except Ozzy. The phrase "at least" in the English Language refers to the person being spoken of. It referrs to the fact that Ozzy treated everyone the same and was in turn was willing to help players out in addition to enforcing the rules to the letter.
"At least" is a comparison. You're saying "at least" this, and not that. Saying 'at least the cat isn't wet' is actually an incomplete sentence when used on its own because there's no frame of reference. The cat isn't wet, but something else is. The at least actually refers to the subject that you never mentioned, an incomplete thought without a point of reference.
Luckily, as this is a conversation, we do have a point of reference. Two admins were mentioned in this thread prior to that post. We have Rose who the original post was about and whose punishment is questioned. Then we have a reference to Ozzy and his similar punishment.
Let's edit your sentence for proper grammar.
"True" (a reference to what we can safely assume was the previous post. True only makes sense when referring to how Ozzy's punishment 'sucked') "but at least Ozzy enforced the rules and did so evenly and fairly to everyone regardless of who you were, [where as *insert admin/pk name here* did not enforce the rules evenly and fairly]" See, the 'at least' portion of the sentence makes the most sense when used in a complete sentence. Now we just need to figure out who the unmentioned admin/pk is. Given the tense of the original sentence, you could assume that it was a reference to a past pk/admin. But as no other pk/admin has been mentioned within this thread, other than Rose, we have to assume that that was the intended target of comparison. To complete the sentence we find:
I agree, Ozzy's punishments sucked. Rose does not enforce the rules evenly and fairly regardless of who you are, but at least Ozzy enforced the rules and did so evenly and fairly to everyone regardless of who you were.
There are other, less important issues with the sentence (tense and person, mostly), but I think the main issues are solved.
I make this point mostly because I'm bored and enjoy a good grammatical debate.
The rules say that a player is allowed to use a second character while one is afk training This training do not nessessarily mean afk leveling/mining clays in uber while the second is overmugging noobs.
Where do the rules say that?
Section 1, Subsection M - Double Logging
New Rule
Double logging has recently been allowed. The characters cannot be used to power level or power rank. In the event of a full server, double logged players should remove one character.
If you are active on one character, the secondary character is considered AFK and will be treated as such. You double log at your own risk.
You emphasize a very specific part of a rule to make a point, but the rule you're quoting and using to make your point is made up...by you. You're probably just mistaken, it happens. I'm just saying, you appear to be mistaken quite often, perhaps without even realizing it.
http://forums.pcrpg.org/viewtopic.php?t=5455That is a link to the most recent updates and additions to the rules.
Like I said above, I don't mind making peace. I carry no hatred, I just really really dislike the stuff you say about me. What you're doing is mudslinging. You appear to invent things and post them globally (in server and forum) for all to see with no shred of evidence for any of it. I don't do any of that to you. All I've done is expressed to others my dislike of you and called you stupid and, occasionally, an idiot. It is a very direct insult and very obviously my opinion. On your side, you don't post your opinion, you post lies about me and call it the truth to discredit my character.
I don't even know you, so I can't actually like or dislike 'you,' just the things that you say and do.
I continue this debate because I enjoy a well formed argument and because I'd like you to stop suggesting that I break rules on the server where I do my best to enforce them and provide an enjoyable atmosphere for players to play in.
