I have never seen evidence of Saddam doing anything bad since the first gulf war... most of the date I read of him doing anything are before 1991, so doesn't that mean he learned his lesson? -shrug- I'm not here to defend Saddam, but I can't help but feel we lacked evidence while going into the war... I just wonder why we pick on a nation that has maybe a 15% chance in the future of devoloping nuclear weapons while we don't strike at a country like north korea which has already declared itself a nuclear power and already has nuclear weapons? I have nothing against Bush, because for one thing he can't do anything without congress' approval... but Gulf War 2 is the first time in the history in the USA we've striked first... in every previous war we acted in only revenge but this time we bullied them.. though many believed we had a reason, it wasn't solid proof... for one thing, we still haven't found any weapons of mass destruction.